Monday, March 17th, 2025

Why did there be a ruckus, missed what happened in a T20 match on Friday?


Last update:

Concussion Substitute Controversy India defeated England by 15 runs in the fourth match to take an unbeatable 3–1 lead in the T20 series. All-rounders Hardik Pandya and Shivam Dubey scored 53-53 runs to bring the team to 181 runs. Debut in …Read more

Controversy over Convention Substitute in fourth T20 match between India and England

Highlights

  • India won the T20 series by defeating England.
  • Hardik Pandya and Shivam Dubey scored 53-53 runs.
  • There was a dispute over the Concisition Substitute.

New Delhi. The fourth match of the 5 -match T20 series was played between India and England on Friday 31 January. Team India won it and took an unassailable 3–1 lead in the series. The Indian team came out to bat first and scored 181 runs for 9 wickets. England’s team was all out on a score of 166 runs in 19.4 overs. With winning the match by 15 runs, India won the series. This means that the series has now become the name of India. During the match, there was a ruckus about the Convention Substitute. If you too missed Friday’s T20 match, then we tell you what the ruckus happened.

For the first time in the 5 -match T20 series, England captain Jose Butler won the toss and chose bowling according to his/her mind. India had fallen 5 wickets on the score of 79 runs. England had strengthened the grip but the fifty of Hardik Pandya and Shivam Dubey changed the map of the match. India managed to reach the score of 181 runs. Both Hardik and Shivam scored 53-53 runs. Ravi Bishnoi and Harshit Rana, who are making debut, took 3-3 wickets and put the match in India’s bag.

Screenshot 2025 02 01 084016 2025 02 e868f52e5419892f6d887aa725b70dd4

England captain Jose Butler angry with India’s Convention Substitute

What happened in the match on Friday
In the fourth match played between India and England in Pune, there was a ruckus about the Convention Substitute. During the batting of Shivam Dubey, Jamie overson’s high speed was on the ball helmet in the last over. Although even after this, Shivam batted but it came to bowling, then India replaced Harshit Rana as a conversion substitute. This replacement became the real reason for the controversy.

AP25031616516229 2025 01 59037f31b26fa7b49000d2767ee40d8b

What was the dispute over
In place of Shivam Dubey, India replaced Harshit Rana as a convention subsidy. According to the ICC rule, if a player suffers head injury during the match, then another player of the same capacity can come to play his/her place. Harshit Rana bowls at a speed of 150 while Shivam Dubey has a speed of 125-130 km per hour. Harshit Rana is a fast bowler while Shivam Dubey all -rounder. The England captain raised questions about this. he/she clearly stated that this replacement was not done according to the ICC rule.



Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *