Somewhere there is disagreement with the decision and somewhere there is denial of the crime itself… Why are the leaders raising questions on the court in the Sisodia and Brijbhushan cases?

New Delhi: Can the court’s decision be questioned? This discussion started because two Delhi courts gave important orders on Tuesday. One case was related to the bail of Aam Aadmi Party leader Manish Sisodia and the other case was related to BJP MP and former President of Indian Wrestling Federation Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh. Both the cases came up in different courts but both the parties raised questions on whatever was said by the court. Be it the case of Manish Sisodia’s bail plea being rejected by the Delhi High Court, the court refused him/her bail. However, AAP disagreed with the court’s decision. Minister Atishi said that we respectfully disagree with this decision. On the other hand, the case of sexual harassment of female wrestlers by BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh was heard in Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court. The court framed charges against him/her but the BJP MP reacted saying that he/she did not plead guilty.

Why question the court’s comment?

Both the cases may be different but a new discussion has started regarding the way the accused party reacted. At some places, disagreement is being expressed on the court’s decision and at some places, despite the framing of charges, the crime itself is being denied. Both sides refused to accept the court’s comments and planned to appeal further. Questions are being raised on these matters whether leaders can question the court’s order? Know what has happened so far in both the cases.

Danger of tampering with evidence… Why did the High Court not grant bail to Manish Sisodia, 5 big things

Manish Sisodia’s bail plea rejected

Aam Aadmi Party has expressed disagreement with the Delhi High Court’s decision to reject the bail plea of ​​former Delhi Education Minister Manish Sisodia. The party termed the alleged liquor scam as a conspiracy by BJP and said that this conspiracy was hatched to destroy the Aam Aadmi Party. It has also been said that an application for the bail of Manish Sisodia will soon be filed in the Supreme Court. The party has expressed hope that just as Arvind Kejriwal got interim bail, similarly we hope that Manish Sisodia will also get justice from the Supreme Court.

Respectfully disagree with the decision – Atishi

Senior Aam Aadmi Party leader and Delhi government minister Atishi held a press conference at the party headquarters after the court’s decision. he/she said that Delhi High Court has rejected the bail application of Manish Sisodia. We respect the High Court, but respectfully disagree with this decision, because this so-called liquor scam is a political conspiracy of BJP. Which has been designed to attack and crush the Aam Aadmi Party. When BJP was unable to defeat Aam Aadmi Party in Delhi and Punjab, this conspiracy was hatched through ED and CBI.

Preparation to challenge the High Court’s decision in the Supreme Court

Atishi said that this is completely a political conspiracy and the proof of this is that despite the investigation going on for two years, till now the ED has not been able to recover even a single rupee from any Aam Aadmi Party leader. Atishi said that this entire case has been made on the basis of statements taken under pressure from some accused. Accusing BJP of using PMLA Act and ED as a political weapon, he/she said that the end of BJP is near. The people of the country are going to oust the BJP government on June 4 with the power of their votes.

Charges framed against Brij Bhushan in sexual harassment case against female wrestlers

The Magistrate Court of Rouse Avenue Court on Tuesday formally framed charges against BJP MP and former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in the case of sexual harassment of women wrestlers. The court framed charges under seven sections, which he/she refused to accept and claimed to prosecute. Brijbhushan Sharan Singh, as the WFI chief, applied in the court demanding call detail record (CDR) and travel documents related to his/her foreign travel. his/her lawyer said that the accused’s contention is that he/she did not stay in the same hotel with the players during foreign tours. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Priyanka Rajput sought a reply from Delhi Police on this and fixed June 1 for trial in the case. Earlier, the court informed Brij Bhushan about the charges framed against him/her. Charges have been framed against Singh under seven sections of the IPC, including sexual harassment, intimidation and insulting the dignity of women.

If I am not guilty then why should I accept the charges – Brij Bhushan

The former WFI chief claimed his/her innocence before the court and demanded a trial. Brij Bhushan said, ‘Why would I accept the blame when I am not guilty?’ The court informed him/her about framing of criminal intimidation charges against Vinod Tomar, co-accused in the case and former assistant secretary of WFI. Brij Bhushan, the sitting BJP MP from Kaiserganj in Uttar Pradesh, was not given a ticket to contest the Lok Sabha elections following sexual harassment allegations against him/her. The party has fielded his/her son Karan Bhushan Singh from this seat.

A day earlier, a sessions court of Patiala House Court postponed its decision till July 27 on the issue of cancellation of police report filed in the POCSO case against Brijbhushan Sharan Singh. The court has to decide whether to accept the police report filed to quash the case or not. Additional Sessions Judge Chhavi Kapoor was to pass the order on Monday but like last time, this time too he/she said that there is a need to seek some clarification in the matter.