Thursday, March 20th, 2025

It is not necessary for the accused to stay in jail in a murder case…and the Supreme Court granted bail, know what arguments were made in the court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has said that it is a misconception that if a case of murder is registered against a person, then such a person will have to remain in jail continuously and will have to remain in jail during the trial without giving bail. Making this comment, the Supreme Court bench led by Justice AS Oka granted bail to the accused in the murder case.Know what is the matter?
On Friday, this matter came before the Supreme Court for hearing. The matter is of Rajasthan. When the hearing of the case started, the lawyer appearing for the state government opposed the bail application and said that there is a murder charge against the accused and it is a serious charge. A demand for bail was made on behalf of accused Deepak. The Supreme Court disagreed with the opposition to the bail application by the state government’s counsel.

What arguments were raised in the court?
In this important comment, the bench said that it is a completely wrong notion that if a case of murder is registered against a person, then such a person will have to remain in jail continuously. Such an assumption is wrong and we will also look at the circumstances of the case. The Supreme Court said that there is no other case against the accused nor is there any such history. The Supreme Court granted bail to the accused.

It is a completely wrong notion that if a case of murder is registered against a person, then such a person will have to remain in jail continuously. We will also look at the circumstances of the case.

Supreme Court

The matter is of October 2023. A case of murder has been registered against the accused. In the petition filed on behalf of the accused, it has been said that this case is of an accident on the road. In this case, there was a collision on the road and this case was given the color of murder and the accused has been wrongly implicated. The postmortem report of the deceased was presented on behalf of the accused and the statement of the witnesses was also cited in which the witnesses had said that it was an accident. It was argued on behalf of the petitioner that the postmortem report also revealed that it was an accident. This year, Rajasthan High Court had rejected the bail application of the accused and said that the allegation is serious. After this, the door of the Supreme Court was approached in the matter.

Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *