What is the claim of users?
A user named X @akhilesh_yDV_ shared a video of Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand and wrote, ‘Shankaracharya ji reprimanded Yogi Adityanath on video call, resign.’
At the same time, a user named @Kapilmunitiwari also wrote, ‘Shankaracharya ji reprimanded Yogi Adityanath ji on video call, those who were insulting Shankaracharya ji, they should also demand an apology for nose, Jagatguru From Shankaracharya. Resign two
What is the truth of viral video?
When the team’s team investigated the viral video, the claims made on social media turned out to be false. First of all, the vigilant team took out the video keframe and checked it with Google Lens and got many other posts. Similar claims were made in those posts.
See post
After that, the team’s team searched the watermark Exclusive media on the video on Google, after which a YouTube channel was found on which a viral video was found. However, a video of 47 seconds was also found here. On which it was written, ‘Mahakumbh 2025, Shankaracharya is seen scolding video calls, Yogi Adityanath made a mistake of mistake’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cvuwcxvahi
After that we started searching for Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand’s recent interview on YouTube which he/she has given on video calls. After scrutinizing some videos, a video was found on a YouTube channel named Jamawat. In which Shankaracharya is seen giving Avimukteshwaranand interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP99bhdszx4
In this video, viral video can be heard at 6 minutes 11 seconds, in which they are saying that you were saying that you are making full arrangements. You were saying that 40 crores are coming, 100 crores have been arranged, so 40 crores are coming, so why is the system going bad.
conclusion: On social media, Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand’s claim to reprimand Yogi Adityanath turned out to be fake in the investigation of the alert. Investigation revealed that Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand was giving an interview to a YouTube channel, at the same time the video was recorded from another camera, which the users are sharing with the wrong claim.
