Thursday, February 20th, 2025

China’s Deepsek AI has to face global outrage over Uingur sensorship and promotion




Human rights activists and international experts have strongly criticized China’s newly developed AI platform, Deepsek following concerns about their role in spreading the state’s promotion, sensitive subjects and collecting personal data. When marketing as a technological advancement, the platform has come under fire for important moral and safety issues, according to Ureghur’s campaign.

Uingur’s campaign highlighted that Deepsek aggressively collects and collects personal information such as IP addresses and conversations on servers located in China. This has expressed concern about potential misuse by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is known for the history of human rights violations. Deepsac has also been accused of calming disagreeable opinions, especially on topics related to Xinjiang, it is feared that it is being used as a tool for state-proposed digital monitoring.

Ragan Abbas, executive director of the campaign for Uygar, condemned the platform on social media, saying, “It collects sensitive data that will benefit the CCP, which is known for human rights violations. Chinese AI platforms and apps fuel dangers including digital transnational suppression. We cannot ignore it. his/her statement emphasizes increasing anxiety over the dangers generated by AI devices that can facilitate sensorship and monitoring.

John Czarnocki, a digital law expert in Switzerland, shared his/her experience with Deepsek on X. “Deepsek can be a technical success, but it is also a mouthpiece for Chinese propagation,” Czarnocki said. he/she explained how he/she tried to achieve AI to accept China’s actions as a genocide in Xinjiang and as crimes against humanity under international law. However, every time he/she raised the issue, AI suddenly stopped responding, stating that Query could not be supported. Czarnocki stated that AI’s reactions about Xinjiang were scripted heavy, they were called “a template example of Chinese propagation”.

In response, Czarnocki suggested that the open-source framework of the lamp be withdrawn using truth data to ensure safety and prevent dependence on Chinese APIs.

Further criticism was from Open Source Intel, a US-based news and intelligence organization, which revealed that Deepsek refused to resolve questions about Uygar’s treatment.

Critics argue that platforms such as Deepsak are an increasing threat to free speech and privacy. he/she asks the international community to take a firm stance against such devices of repression.



Share on:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *